-
1 formal reply
Общая лексика: отписка (Vereschagin) -
2 formal reply
-
3 send a formal reply
-
4 formal
формальний; офіційний; належним чином оформлений; запротокольований; встановлений закономformal admission in answer to a notice to admit facts — формальне визнання факту у відповідь на повідомлення з вимогою визнати факти по справі
formal admission in answer to interrogatories — формальне визнання факту у відповідь на запитання, що міститься у письмовому опитуванні
- formal accusation of a crimeformal qualifications for presidential candidacy — встановлені законом вимоги до кандидата у президенти
- formal acquiescence
- formal address
- formal adjudication
- formal admission
- formal admission at the trial
- formal admission by letter
- formal agreement
- formal amendment
- formal approval
- formal authority
- formal authorization
- formal charge
- formal contract
- formal conviction
- formal decision
- formal declaration
- formal declaration of war
- formal defect
- formal diversion
- formal document
- formal effort
- formal entity
- formal equality
- formal equality at law
- formal error
- formal examination
- formal head of state
- formal justification
- formal law
- formal legislation
- formal means of lawmaking
- formal notification
- formal order
- formal permission
- formal point of view
- formal police action
- formal police powers
- formal power
- formal powers
- formal procedure
- formal process
- formal proof
- formal protest
- formal punitive system
- formal qualifications
- formal registration
- formal relations
- formal reply
- formal request
- formal requirement
- formal requisition
- formal right
- formal service
- formal signature
- formal social security system
- formal source
- formal statement
- formal submission
- formal treaty
- formal trial stage
- formal verdict
- formal vote
- formal warrant -
5 відписка
formal reply, non-committal reply -
6 отписка
1) General subject: buck slip, come off, formal reply (Vereschagin), runaround, run-around reply (http://wiseconservatism.com/2009/06/04/understanding-obama-helps-if-you-study-mussolini/), non-committal reply2) Colloquial: a kiss-off (формальный ответ в письменном виде с целью уклониться от решения данной проблемы a reply intended to avoid taking action or making a decision (in Russian a formal written reply); crude), come-off, the run-around -
7 отписка
презр.
answer written for form only, formal reply* * ** * *answer written for form only, formal reply* * * -
8 отписка
-
9 давати відписку
send a formal reply, send a non-committal reply -
10 send
направляти, відправляти, передавати, надсилати; підсилатиsend an act of auditing to the procurator's office — передавати акт фінансової перевірки до прокуратури
send back the case to a lower court — відправляти справу на перегляд рішення (на дослідування) до нижчого суду
- sender- send a confidential report
- send a formal reply
- send a killer
- send a large shipment
- send a non-committal reply
- send a note of protest
- send an ultimatum
- send back
- send back a bill
- send back a case
- send by diplomatic bag
- send by diplomatic mail
- send coded message
- send down a bill
- send for trial
- send in a petition
- send in a an application
- send in cipher by radio
- send mail bombs
- send to a mental hospital
- send to an asylum
- send to imprisonment
- send to prison
- send to prison for life
- send to the guillotine
- send to the chair
- send to the gallows
- send to the scaffold
- send to trial
- send up a bill
- send up a case -
11 وافق
وَافَقَ \ accord: to agree with: His statement does not accord with the facts. agree: to have the same opinion: I agree with your ideas about music, to say ‘yes’; be willing I asked him to help me and he agreed, to suit one’s health or stomach Strong cheese does not agree with me. approve: to agree; consider as satisfactory: We don’t approve of your behaviour. If you approve, I’ll invite him to dinner. Our plans were approved by the meeting. assent: to agree to something. coincide: (of two or more events) to happen (often by chance) at the same time: He’s pleased that the special holiday next week coincides with his birthday. consent: to agree; be willing: She consented to my wishes. \ See Also اتَّفَقَ مع \ أُوافِق \ to be sure: I agree: Yes, he’s small, to be sure, but he’s strong. \ أُوافِق مُوَافَقَةً تامّة \ absolutely: certainly: Do you think so? "Absolutely.". \ أُوافِقُك على ما تَقُول \ quite: (as a rather formal reply) I agree: ‘I think it’s a shame!’ ‘Quite (so)! But what can we do about it?’. \ وَافَقَ عَلَى \ accept: to agree with (an idea, etc.). pass: to accept after formal consideration: The government passed a law against it. \ وَافَقَ مُكرَهًا على \ give way: to let sb. do what he wants, though one does not agree with it: He gave way to his workers’ demands. submit: to accept defeat, punishment, etc.: The boy submitted to having his hair cut. -
12 отписка
ж.an answer written for form only, formal reply -
13 отписываться
отписатьсяmake* a (purely) formal reply -
14 quite
أُوافِقُك على ما تَقُول \ quite: (as a rather formal reply) I agree: ‘I think it’s a shame!’ ‘Quite (so)! But what can we do about it?’. -
15 отписка
formal / noncommittal reply -
16 usted
intj.you there.pron.ustedes youcontesten ustedes a las preguntas please answer the questionsde usted/ustedes yoursme gustaría hablar con usted I'd like to talk to youhablar o tratar de usted a alguien = to address somebody as “usted”, i.e. formally* * *1 formal you\tratar a alguien de usted to use the polite form of address with somebody* * *pron.- ustedes* * *PRON PERS1) [en singular] you ( polite or formal address)- muchas gracias -a usted — "thank you very much" - "thank you"
hablar o llamar o tratar de usted a algn — to use the "usted" form with sb, address sb using the "usted" form
no me hables de usted, que no soy tan vieja — you needn't use the "usted" form with me - I'm not that old
2)pasen ustedes, por favor — please come in
a ver, niños ¿ustedes qué quieren para cenar? — esp LAm right, what do you children want for tea?
* * *pronombre personal [Polite form of address but also used in some areas, eg Colombia and Chile, instead of the familiar tú form]1)a) ( como sujeto) you¿quién lo va a hacer? - ¿usted? — who's going to do it? - you (are)
b) (en comparaciones, con preposiciones) youcon/contra/para usted — with/against/for you
2) ( uno) you, one (frml)le dicen eso y usted no sabe qué contestar — when they say that you just don't know o one just doesn't know what to say in reply
* * *= you, thou.Nota: Forma arcaica.Ex. I am glad of the opportunity to discuss this subject for several reasons: firstly, I have been interested in it for some time and would like to share some of my thoughts with you.Ex. The article ' Thou shalt not read: banned books for children' argues that the obligation of librarians to young adults is to offer a broad range of choices that entertain, comfort, enlighten and inspire them.----* a usted = you.* a ustedes = you.* a usted mismo = thyself.* con usted = with you.* con ustedes = with you.* en cuanto a usted = as for you.* todos ustedes = you all.* ustedes = you.* * *pronombre personal [Polite form of address but also used in some areas, eg Colombia and Chile, instead of the familiar tú form]1)a) ( como sujeto) you¿quién lo va a hacer? - ¿usted? — who's going to do it? - you (are)
b) (en comparaciones, con preposiciones) youcon/contra/para usted — with/against/for you
2) ( uno) you, one (frml)le dicen eso y usted no sabe qué contestar — when they say that you just don't know o one just doesn't know what to say in reply
* * *= you, thou.Nota: Forma arcaica.Ex: I am glad of the opportunity to discuss this subject for several reasons: firstly, I have been interested in it for some time and would like to share some of my thoughts with you.
Ex: The article ' Thou shalt not read: banned books for children' argues that the obligation of librarians to young adults is to offer a broad range of choices that entertain, comfort, enlighten and inspire them.* a usted = you.* a ustedes = you.* a usted mismo = thyself.* con usted = with you.* con ustedes = with you.* en cuanto a usted = as for you.* todos ustedes = you all.* ustedes = you.* * *[Polite form of address but also used in some areas, eg Colombia and Chile, instead of the familiar tú form]A1 (como sujeto) you¿quién lo va a hacer? — usted who's going to do it? — you (are)¿es usted, Sr. Martínez? is that you, Mr Martínez?¡oiga, usted! hey, you!¿usted qué hace aquí? what are you doing here?lo que usted diga whatever you saytratar a algn de usted to address sb using the usted form¡usted se come la sopa, señorita! (you) eat your soup, young lady!2 (en comparaciones, con preposiciones) youyo salí después que usted I left after you (did)no es tan alta como usted she isn't as tall as you¿se lo dieron a usted? did they give it to you?con/contra/para usted with/against/for youson de usted they're yoursle dicen eso y usted no sabe qué contestar when they say that you just don't know o one just doesn't know what to answer* * *
usted pron pers [Polite form of address but also used in some areas, eg Colombia and Chile, instead of the familiar◊ tú form]
1 (como sujeto, en comparaciones, con preposición) you;◊ ¿quién lo va a hacer? — usted who's going to do it? — you (are);
tratar a algn de usted to address sb using the usted form;
muchas gracias — a usted thank you very much — thank you;
son de usted they're yours
2 ( uso impersonal) you, one (frml);◊ le dicen eso y usted no sabe qué contestar when they say that you just don't know what to say in reply
usted, pl ustedes pron pers frml you: usted disculpe, ¿a qué hora sale el tren?, excuse me, what time does the train leave?
' usted' also found in these entries:
Spanish:
amabilidad
- así
- consigo
- delante
- derecha
- derecho
- desear
- la
- le
- metálica
- metálico
- se
- servidor
- servidora
- sí
- su
- suya
- suyo
- ud.
- ustedes
- Vd.
- Vds.
- vos
- breve
- decir
- detener
- deuda
- dirigir
- gustar
- informado
- libertad
- lo
- particular
English:
after
- call
- chance
- do
- first
- fracture
- you
- yourself
- hold
- irrespective
- sincerely
- suggest
- take
* * *usted pron personal While the singular suggests formality in most countries, ustedes is the standard form of the second person plural in Latin America.1. [sujeto] you;ustedes you [plural];contesten ustedes a las preguntas please answer the questions;tendrá que hacerlo usted mismo you'll have to do it (all by) yourself;he aprobado y usted también I passed and so did you;como ustedes quieran as you wish;¿cómo se llama usted? what's your name?2. [predicado] you;ustedes you [plural];¿quién es usted? who are you?;los invitados son ustedes you're the guests3. [con preposición o conjunción] you;ustedes you [plural];esto es para usted this is for you;me gustaría hablar con usted I'd like to talk to you;trabaja tanto como usted she works as hard as you (do);de usted/ustedes [posesivo] yours;¿es de usted este paraguas? is this umbrella yours?;muchas gracias – (gracias) a usted thank you very much – (no,) thank YOU4. [vocativo]¡oiga, usted, se le ha caído esto! excuse me, you dropped this* * *pron you;tratar de usted address as ‘usted’;ustedes pl you;de usted/ustedes your;es de usted/ustedes it’s yours* * *usted pron1) (formal form of address in most countries; often written as Ud. or Vd.) : you* * *usted pron you -
17 Language
Philosophy is written in that great book, the universe, which is always open, right before our eyes. But one cannot understand this book without first learning to understand the language and to know the characters in which it is written. It is written in the language of mathematics, and the characters are triangles, circles, and other figures. Without these, one cannot understand a single word of it, and just wanders in a dark labyrinth. (Galileo, 1990, p. 232)It never happens that it [a nonhuman animal] arranges its speech in various ways in order to reply appropriately to everything that may be said in its presence, as even the lowest type of man can do. (Descartes, 1970a, p. 116)It is a very remarkable fact that there are none so depraved and stupid, without even excepting idiots, that they cannot arrange different words together, forming of them a statement by which they make known their thoughts; while, on the other hand, there is no other animal, however perfect and fortunately circumstanced it may be, which can do the same. (Descartes, 1967, p. 116)Human beings do not live in the object world alone, nor alone in the world of social activity as ordinarily understood, but are very much at the mercy of the particular language which has become the medium of expression for their society. It is quite an illusion to imagine that one adjusts to reality essentially without the use of language and that language is merely an incidental means of solving specific problems of communication or reflection. The fact of the matter is that the "real world" is to a large extent unconsciously built on the language habits of the group.... We see and hear and otherwise experience very largely as we do because the language habits of our community predispose certain choices of interpretation. (Sapir, 1921, p. 75)It powerfully conditions all our thinking about social problems and processes.... No two languages are ever sufficiently similar to be considered as representing the same social reality. The worlds in which different societies live are distinct worlds, not merely the same worlds with different labels attached. (Sapir, 1985, p. 162)[A list of language games, not meant to be exhaustive:]Giving orders, and obeying them- Describing the appearance of an object, or giving its measurements- Constructing an object from a description (a drawing)Reporting an eventSpeculating about an eventForming and testing a hypothesisPresenting the results of an experiment in tables and diagramsMaking up a story; and reading itPlay actingSinging catchesGuessing riddlesMaking a joke; and telling itSolving a problem in practical arithmeticTranslating from one language into anotherLANGUAGE Asking, thanking, cursing, greeting, and praying-. (Wittgenstein, 1953, Pt. I, No. 23, pp. 11 e-12 e)We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages.... The world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... No individual is free to describe nature with absolute impartiality but is constrained to certain modes of interpretation even while he thinks himself most free. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 153, 213-214)We dissect nature along the lines laid down by our native languages.The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds.... We are thus introduced to a new principle of relativity, which holds that all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar or can in some way be calibrated. (Whorf, 1956, pp. 213-214)9) The Forms of a Person's Thoughts Are Controlled by Unperceived Patterns of His Own LanguageThe forms of a person's thoughts are controlled by inexorable laws of pattern of which he is unconscious. These patterns are the unperceived intricate systematizations of his own language-shown readily enough by a candid comparison and contrast with other languages, especially those of a different linguistic family. (Whorf, 1956, p. 252)It has come to be commonly held that many utterances which look like statements are either not intended at all, or only intended in part, to record or impart straightforward information about the facts.... Many traditional philosophical perplexities have arisen through a mistake-the mistake of taking as straightforward statements of fact utterances which are either (in interesting non-grammatical ways) nonsensical or else intended as something quite different. (Austin, 1962, pp. 2-3)In general, one might define a complex of semantic components connected by logical constants as a concept. The dictionary of a language is then a system of concepts in which a phonological form and certain syntactic and morphological characteristics are assigned to each concept. This system of concepts is structured by several types of relations. It is supplemented, furthermore, by redundancy or implicational rules..., representing general properties of the whole system of concepts.... At least a relevant part of these general rules is not bound to particular languages, but represents presumably universal structures of natural languages. They are not learned, but are rather a part of the human ability to acquire an arbitrary natural language. (Bierwisch, 1970, pp. 171-172)In studying the evolution of mind, we cannot guess to what extent there are physically possible alternatives to, say, transformational generative grammar, for an organism meeting certain other physical conditions characteristic of humans. Conceivably, there are none-or very few-in which case talk about evolution of the language capacity is beside the point. (Chomsky, 1972, p. 98)[It is] truth value rather than syntactic well-formedness that chiefly governs explicit verbal reinforcement by parents-which renders mildly paradoxical the fact that the usual product of such a training schedule is an adult whose speech is highly grammatical but not notably truthful. (R. O. Brown, 1973, p. 330)he conceptual base is responsible for formally representing the concepts underlying an utterance.... A given word in a language may or may not have one or more concepts underlying it.... On the sentential level, the utterances of a given language are encoded within a syntactic structure of that language. The basic construction of the sentential level is the sentence.The next highest level... is the conceptual level. We call the basic construction of this level the conceptualization. A conceptualization consists of concepts and certain relations among those concepts. We can consider that both levels exist at the same point in time and that for any unit on one level, some corresponding realizate exists on the other level. This realizate may be null or extremely complex.... Conceptualizations may relate to other conceptualizations by nesting or other specified relationships. (Schank, 1973, pp. 191-192)The mathematics of multi-dimensional interactive spaces and lattices, the projection of "computer behavior" on to possible models of cerebral functions, the theoretical and mechanical investigation of artificial intelligence, are producing a stream of sophisticated, often suggestive ideas.But it is, I believe, fair to say that nothing put forward until now in either theoretic design or mechanical mimicry comes even remotely in reach of the most rudimentary linguistic realities. (Steiner, 1975, p. 284)The step from the simple tool to the master tool, a tool to make tools (what we would now call a machine tool), seems to me indeed to parallel the final step to human language, which I call reconstitution. It expresses in a practical and social context the same understanding of hierarchy, and shows the same analysis by function as a basis for synthesis. (Bronowski, 1977, pp. 127-128)t is the language donn eґ in which we conduct our lives.... We have no other. And the danger is that formal linguistic models, in their loosely argued analogy with the axiomatic structure of the mathematical sciences, may block perception.... It is quite conceivable that, in language, continuous induction from simple, elemental units to more complex, realistic forms is not justified. The extent and formal "undecidability" of context-and every linguistic particle above the level of the phoneme is context-bound-may make it impossible, except in the most abstract, meta-linguistic sense, to pass from "pro-verbs," "kernals," or "deep deep structures" to actual speech. (Steiner, 1975, pp. 111-113)A higher-level formal language is an abstract machine. (Weizenbaum, 1976, p. 113)Jakobson sees metaphor and metonymy as the characteristic modes of binarily opposed polarities which between them underpin the two-fold process of selection and combination by which linguistic signs are formed.... Thus messages are constructed, as Saussure said, by a combination of a "horizontal" movement, which combines words together, and a "vertical" movement, which selects the particular words from the available inventory or "inner storehouse" of the language. The combinative (or syntagmatic) process manifests itself in contiguity (one word being placed next to another) and its mode is metonymic. The selective (or associative) process manifests itself in similarity (one word or concept being "like" another) and its mode is metaphoric. The "opposition" of metaphor and metonymy therefore may be said to represent in effect the essence of the total opposition between the synchronic mode of language (its immediate, coexistent, "vertical" relationships) and its diachronic mode (its sequential, successive, lineal progressive relationships). (Hawkes, 1977, pp. 77-78)It is striking that the layered structure that man has given to language constantly reappears in his analyses of nature. (Bronowski, 1977, p. 121)First, [an ideal intertheoretic reduction] provides us with a set of rules"correspondence rules" or "bridge laws," as the standard vernacular has it-which effect a mapping of the terms of the old theory (T o) onto a subset of the expressions of the new or reducing theory (T n). These rules guide the application of those selected expressions of T n in the following way: we are free to make singular applications of their correspondencerule doppelgangers in T o....Second, and equally important, a successful reduction ideally has the outcome that, under the term mapping effected by the correspondence rules, the central principles of T o (those of semantic and systematic importance) are mapped onto general sentences of T n that are theorems of Tn. (P. Churchland, 1979, p. 81)If non-linguistic factors must be included in grammar: beliefs, attitudes, etc. [this would] amount to a rejection of the initial idealization of language as an object of study. A priori such a move cannot be ruled out, but it must be empirically motivated. If it proves to be correct, I would conclude that language is a chaos that is not worth studying.... Note that the question is not whether beliefs or attitudes, and so on, play a role in linguistic behavior and linguistic judgments... [but rather] whether distinct cognitive structures can be identified, which interact in the real use of language and linguistic judgments, the grammatical system being one of these. (Chomsky, 1979, pp. 140, 152-153)23) Language Is Inevitably Influenced by Specific Contexts of Human InteractionLanguage cannot be studied in isolation from the investigation of "rationality." It cannot afford to neglect our everyday assumptions concerning the total behavior of a reasonable person.... An integrational linguistics must recognize that human beings inhabit a communicational space which is not neatly compartmentalized into language and nonlanguage.... It renounces in advance the possibility of setting up systems of forms and meanings which will "account for" a central core of linguistic behavior irrespective of the situation and communicational purposes involved. (Harris, 1981, p. 165)By innate [linguistic knowledge], Chomsky simply means "genetically programmed." He does not literally think that children are born with language in their heads ready to be spoken. He merely claims that a "blueprint is there, which is brought into use when the child reaches a certain point in her general development. With the help of this blueprint, she analyzes the language she hears around her more readily than she would if she were totally unprepared for the strange gabbling sounds which emerge from human mouths. (Aitchison, 1987, p. 31)Looking at ourselves from the computer viewpoint, we cannot avoid seeing that natural language is our most important "programming language." This means that a vast portion of our knowledge and activity is, for us, best communicated and understood in our natural language.... One could say that natural language was our first great original artifact and, since, as we increasingly realize, languages are machines, so natural language, with our brains to run it, was our primal invention of the universal computer. One could say this except for the sneaking suspicion that language isn't something we invented but something we became, not something we constructed but something in which we created, and recreated, ourselves. (Leiber, 1991, p. 8)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Language
-
18 dignarse
pron.v.to deign, to condescend.* * *1 to deign (a, to), condescend (a, to)* * *VPR1)dignarse a hacer algo — to deign to do sth, condescend to do sth
2) frm* * *verbo pronominaldignarse (a) + INF: no se dignaron (a) contestar — they didn't even condescend o deign to reply
* * *verbo pronominaldignarse (a) + INF: no se dignaron (a) contestar — they didn't even condescend o deign to reply
* * *dignarse [A1 ]dignarse ( A) + INF:ni siquiera se dignaron contestar they didn't even condescend o deign to replya ver cuándo te dignas a hacernos una visita ( fam hum); when are you going to deign to pay us a visit? ( hum)dígnese presentarse en nuestras oficinas ( frml); please be so kind as to call at our offices ( frml), we would be grateful if you could come to our offices ( frml)* * *
dignarse ( conjugate dignarse) verbo pronominal dignarse (a) hacer algo to condescend o deign to sth
dignarse verbo reflexivo to condescend [a, to], frml deign [a, to]
' dignarse' also found in these entries:
English:
condescend
- deign
* * *dignarse vprdignarse (a) hacer algo to deign to do sth;no se dignó (a) contestarme he didn't deign to reply;Irónico¡por fin te dignas (a) aparecer por aquí! so you've finally decided to honour us with your presence!;Formaldígnese acudir con la documentación consignada please ensure that you bring the required documents* * *v/r deign (a to)* * *dignarse vr: to deign, to condescendno se dignó contestar: he didn't deign to answer -
19 por favor, responda
= RSVP [R.S.V.P.]Ex. The initials RSVP at the end of a formal invitation stand for a French phrase, 'réspondez, s'il vous plaît,' which means 'please reply'.* * *= RSVP [R.S.V.P.]Ex: The initials RSVP at the end of a formal invitation stand for a French phrase, 'réspondez, s'il vous plaît,' which means 'please reply'.
-
20 règle
règle [ʀεgl]feminine nouna. ( = loi) ruleb. ( = instrument) rulerd. (locutions) dans ce métier, la prudence est de règle in this profession, caution is the rule• il faut faire la demande dans or selon les règles you must make the request through the proper channels* * *ʀɛgl
1.
1) ( instrument) ruler, rule2) ( consigne) rulerespecter les règles du jeu — lit, fig to play the game according to the rules
dans or selon les règles de l'art — by the rule book
il se fait une règle or il a pour règle de payer comptant — he makes it a rule to pay cash
3) ( usage établi) ruleil est de règle de répondre or qu'on réponde — it is customary to reply
2.
règles nom féminin pluriel ( menstruation) period (sg)
3.
en règle locution adjective [demande] formal; [papiers, comptes] in order
4.
en règle locution adverbialepour passer la frontière, il faut être en règle — to cross the frontier, your papers must be in order
* * *ʀɛɡl1. nf1) (= instrument) rulerIl a souligné son nom avec une règle. — He underlined his name with a ruler.
2) (= loi, prescription) ruleC'est la règle. — That's the rule.
en règle générale — as a rule, as a general rule
être en règle [papiers] — to be in order
Mes papiers sont en règle. — My papers are in order.
se mettre en règle [personne] — to put o.s. straight with the authorities
être de règle (= être de mise) — to be usual
2. règles nfplPHYSIOLOGIE period sg* * *A nf1 ( instrument) ruler, rule; à la règle with a ruler;2 ( consigne) rule; règle de grammaire grammatical rule; règle de conduite rule of conduct; les règles de la bienséance the rules of propriety; la règle du jeu lit, fig the rules of the game; respecter les règles du jeu lit, fig to play the game according to the rules; dans or selon les règles according to the rules; dans or selon les règles de l'art by the rule book; il se fait une règle or il a pour règle de payer comptant he makes it a rule to pay cash;3 ( usage établi) rule; c'est la règle that's the rule; en règle générale as a (general) rule; il est de règle de répondre or qu'on réponde it is customary to reply.B règles nfpl Physiol period; est-ce qu'elle a ses règles? ( en ce moment) is she having her period?; ( en général) is she having periods?, is she menstruating?C en règle loc adj [demande] formal; [avertissement] official; [papiers, comptes] in order; subir un interrogatoire en règle to be given a thorough interrogation.D en règle loc adv pour passer la frontière, il faut être en règle to cross the frontier, your papers must be in order; se mettre en règle avec le fisc to get one's tax affairs properly sorted out.règle à calcul slide rule; règle graduée graduated ruler; règle d'or golden rule; règle de trois rule of three; règles de sécurité safety regulations.[rɛgl] nom féminin1. [instrument] ruler2. [principe, code] ruleles règles de l'honneur the rules ou code of honourenfreindre la règle to break the rule ou rules————————règles nom féminin plurielPHYSIOLOGIE [en général] periods[d'un cycle] periodavoir ses règles to be menstruating, to be having one's periodavoir des règles douloureuses to suffer from period ou pains (UK), to suffer from menstrual cramps (US), to have painful periods————————en règle locution adjectivalea. [document] to be in orderb. [personne] to have one's papers in order, to be in possession of valid papersen règle générale locution adverbiale
Страницы
См. также в других словарях:
reply — {{Roman}}I.{{/Roman}} noun ADJECTIVE ▪ brief, monosyllabic (esp. BrE) ▪ blunt, curt, short, terse ▪ His reply was short and to the point … Collocations dictionary
Reply — Re*ply , n.; pl. {Replies} ( pl?z ). [See {Reply}, v. i., and cf. {Replica}.] That which is said, written, or done in answer to what is said, written, or done by another; an answer; a response. [1913 Webster] Syn: Answer; rejoinder; response.… … The Collaborative International Dictionary of English
reply — ▪ I. reply re‧ply 1 [rɪˈplaɪ] verb replied PTandPP [intransitive, transitive] to answer someone, in writing or in speech: reply that • Asked about the bank s operations, the chairman replied that the record speaks for itself. reply to… … Financial and business terms
reply — re|ply1 W2S3 [rıˈplaı] v past tense and past participle replied present participle replying third person singular replies [Date: 1300 1400; : Old French; Origin: replier to fold again , from Latin replicare, from plicare to fold ] 1.) … Dictionary of contemporary English
reply — 1 /rI plaI/ verb 1 (I, T) to answer someone by saying or writing something: I asked Clive where he was going but he didn t reply. (+ to): You must reply to Dennis s letter soon. | reply that: I can only reply that I did not realise what was… … Longman dictionary of contemporary English
formal — adj. 1 very correct/official VERBS ▪ be, seem, sound ▪ become ADVERB ▪ extremely, fairly, very … Collocations dictionary
in reply to — FORMAL ► COMMUNICATIONS used to begin a formal letter that is answering another letter: »In reply to your letter of October 7th, I would like to offer you compensation of €100. Main Entry: ↑reply … Financial and business terms
Right of reply — The right of reply is the right to defend oneself against criticism. In Europe there have been proposals to enshrine the principle in law that there is a legally enforceable right of reply that applies to all media, including newspapers,… … Wikipedia
Trent Affair — James Murray Mason (1798–1871). John Sli … Wikipedia
Anglican Orders — • In the creed of the Catholic Church, Holy Order is one of the Seven Sacraments instituted by Our Lord Jesus Christ Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006. Anglican Orders Anglican Orders … Catholic encyclopedia
USS Liberty incident — Coordinates: 31°23′N 33°23′E / 31.39°N 33.38°E / 31.39; 33.38 … Wikipedia
